Oracle Fusion Program in Shakeup

The departure of John Wookey, a pivotal applications executive, casts doubt on the company's ability to deliver Fusion Applications on its 2008 schedule.


Companies Mentioned
Posted on Oct 17, 2007

Less than a month before Oracle's major annual Open World customer conference, the future of the company's high-profile Fusion Applications project has come into question with the news that the executive who had been leading the initiative, John Wookey, is stepping down, sources said. Wookey, who was Oracle's senior vice president for applications development and an important voice in explaining the Fusion Applications strategy, is reportedly being replaced by Thomas Kurian, the senior vice president responsible for Oracle's Fusion Middleware product development. Kurian will reportedly head development of Oracle's middleware and applications products, reporting to Executive Vice President Chuck Rozwat, as Wookey had done. Oracle officials yesterday declined to comment on the widespread reports of the changes. Several sources close to Oracle, however, confirmed them. News of Wookey's departure underscored widespread speculation that Oracle may soon announce a delay or change in its Fusion Applications development program. "I think you can expect a delay in Fusion Applications," said Ray Wang, an enterprise applications analyst at Forrester Research, in an interview with Managing Automation. Wookey, a 12-year Oracle veteran, took over management of the company's application development teams soon after Oracle acquired PeopleSoft in 2005, replacing Ron Wohl. He was responsible for Fusion Applications development, as well as development of Oracle's existing application products, including E-Business Suite, Enterprise, EnterpriseOne, and World. Besides promising a new enterprise applications suite in Fusion, Oracle has committed to continued support and enhancements for existing legacy products under its Applications Unlimited program. With Wookey's departure, development of existing applications will reportedly pass to his lieutenant, Ed Abbo, who will also report to Rozwat. Fusion Applications has been seen as a make-or-break initiative for Oracle as it battles SAP AG for supremacy in the enterprise applications space. Oracle unveiled the initiative immediately after taking over PeopleSoft, describing Fusion Applications — then called Project Fusion — as a services-oriented merging of the best functionality of its existing enterprise applications. Oracle said Fusion would be ready for the market sometime in 2008. In January 2006, Oracle provided a rare update of the Fusion Applications program, declaring that the company was halfway to achieving its development goals. At that time, Oracle said Fusion Applications would not merge the code of existing Oracle applications, but would be a new, services-based product, written in Java and incorporating the best ideas from existing Oracle applications. Oracle said that the E-Business Suite product would be the starting point for Fusion Applications' functionality and data model. Since then, Oracle has been noticeably quiet about Fusion Applications, while continuing to enhance and support its existing suites and acquiring new applications, including Siebel, Agile, and G-Log. "It's really impossible to know if Oracle is delaying Fusion Apps or not at this point," said Bruce Richardson, chief research officer at AMR Research. "There's really been no concrete information on Fusion since about 30 days after the launch in 2005. They talked about plans to rewrite the apps and get an uber set of functionality; then they backed off talking about it." Wookey's departure from the role of head of applications development does not bode well for the Fusion Applications program, according to Richardson. For one thing, he said, Wookey had acted as an effective buffer between the applications development teams and hard-charging Oracle executives, such as CEO Larry Ellison and Rozwat. For another, he said, bringing applications under the control of middleware management means that the Fusion Applications program will be run by people with less applications experience. Richardson speculated that if Oracle does delay and recast Fusion Applications, the project might end up delivering services-based connectors and workflows that serve to integrate the company's existing enterprise applications. Oracle has already announced an integration strategy along those lines. And Infor Global Solutions, which, like Oracle, has acquired several enterprise applications products, is working in much the same direction with its Open SOA strategy. Sources close to Oracle yesterday said Wookey's departure may have been related to Ellison's decision earlier this year to place responsibility for Oracle's business intelligence product development under Kurian's middleware group rather than Wookey's applications group. Despite a questionable outlook for Fusion, Oracle's applications business has been on a roll of late. The company, in recent financial reports, has said it has been successful in cross-selling applications to existing customers and convincing customers to upgrade their applications. In Oracle's most recent financial quarter, ended Aug. 31, the company reported that overall applications revenue grew to $1.3 billion, up 36% from the same period a year ago. If Oracle delays Fusion Applications, the move will be in marked contrast to the company's ebullience about the project in January 2006. At that time, Oracle Co-President Charles Phillips crowed to an audience of press, analysts, and customers, "No one would have guessed we'd have made as much progress as we have made. We've made incredible progress, and we are ahead of schedule."

Top Enterprise Software Planning (ERP) Comparison