Managing Automation :: Technology Solutions for Progressive Manufacturers Sign in or register  |  Advertise |  Subscribe to MA Magazine  | Newsletters |   My Profile
Ask the Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) Expert: Scheduling Assistance
Ask the Expert

Using Barcodes to Eliminate Mistakes

Asked on May 19 2006 8:44:31:000AM

Q

Our organization is on the verge of implementing Epicore's Vista software. We are an electronics manufacturer using Fuji and Universal Instruments lines to assemble mixed technology, (surface mount & thru hole), products. In the heat of battle, it becomes extremly easy for machine operators to load a reel of 10,000 parts in the wrong location. We feel that using hand held bar-code scanners to scan the OEM bar-codes on these reels, in relationship with the feeder and feeder location on the machine to obtain a GO, NO-GO result, would alleviate, if not eliminate this problem. Can you steer us in the proper direction ???

James Hall, Brookville, OH
AAll of the press for AutoID these days seems to indicate that RFID tags can solve all problems -- but properly applied barcode tags and a good barcode reader terminal are still adequate for solving your problem.

I would use a good programmable wireless handheld barcode reader such as made by Symbol Technologies, Intermec, or others. Then apply your own durable (metal) barcode tags on the hub mechanism close to where the reels of electronic components are mounted.

A small program, perhaps written in Basic or one of the languages supported by the barcode reader, can be used to validate the mounting of the component reels. The procedure would be as follows:

    1) First, read the hub barcode where the reel is to be mounted.

    2) Then read the barcode on the reel of components to be mounted.

    3) Wait for the barcode reader/terminal to give the OK (message, beep.)

    4) The barcode reader/terminal then sends the data with both barcodes to the master station for the assembly machine for data collection.

The program in the reader/terminal has a look-up table to validate that for the product being made, which components (identified by the barcode SKU on the selected reel), are to be mounted on which hub. If the SKU is found in the table for the hub that was just read, then the GO is given. If NOT, then there should be an alarm (NO GO.)

I am assuming that there is a master station for the assembly machine that is to run the Vista data collection software used for reporting component usage and alarms. The data collected can be reviewed so that more training can be given to operators making frequent mistakes.

802.11a in the 5 GHz band would be a better choice for the wireless connection from the barcode reader/terminal to the master station, just to get the radio out of the overloaded 802.11b/g/u band at

2.4 GHz.

Meet the expert

Richard H. Caro

CEO, CMC Associates

In addition to running CMC Associates, Dick is the Chairman of ISA SP50 and formerly of IEC (International Electrotechnical Committee) Fieldbus Standards Committees. Before joining ARC Advisory Group, Dick held the position of Senior Manager with Arthur D. Little, Inc. in Cambridge, MA, and was a founder of Autech Data Systems, and director of marketing at ModComp. In the 1970s, The Foxboro Company employed Dick in both development and marketing positions. He holds a BS and MS in Chemical Engineering, and an MBA. He holds the rank of Fellow of the ISA, and is a Certified Automation Professional. In 2005 Dick was named to the Process Automation Hall of Fame. He has published three books on automation networks.
Ask your question

Please sign in or registerto ask your question now. As a registered member of Managing Automation, you'll have access to all of our industry experts, the entire Research library and tools such as the Custom Software Comparison and Business Assessment Tool.