Managing Automation :: Technology Solutions for Progressive Manufacturers Sign in or register  |  Advertise |  Subscribe to MA Magazine  | Newsletters |   My Profile
Ask the Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) Expert: Scheduling Assistance
Ask the Expert

Lean = flow-based production?

Asked on Sep 22 2005 12:06:15:000PM

Q

What is the difference between a Lean shop and a flow-based production environment? Aren't they essentially the same thing?

Don, Pawtucket, RI
ALean shops are using the principles and practices derived from the Toyota Production System developed by in the late 1970s. Whereas flow-based production is based on a variation of this system, as developed by John Costanza and promoted by the John Costanza Institute (JCIT). Because hundreds of manufacturers sent people to JCIT for education in his Demand Flow approach, the use of flow concepts and systems exist in a number of companies.

Flow and Lean share similar principles, but the execution differs. Lean scheduling is done with a Heijunka scheduling tool, while a Flow schedule is done with a demand driven planning technique on a given pacemaker work cell. Both approaches are TACT (or demand driven), and both are designed to level production across the plant by scheduling a pacemaker operation, pull material with Kanbans, and reduce inventory and waste.

However, the Heijunka scheduling approach is visual and simpler to understand and execute. It simply factors the current tact and target inventory levels (in days) and then sequences the order of products in relationship to daily demand. The Demand Flow Technology used by JCIT considers resource constraints in its calculation for a given production line, which requires more complex calculations.

Sponsored by
Meet the expert

David Alschuler

Principal, Industry Directions Inc.

David has been an industry analyst in the enterprise software sector for 10 years and was a software marketing executive for the prior 15 years. He currently follows manufacturing software solutions for Industry Directions. From 1998 to 2005 he directed the Enterprise Applications research teams at Aberdeen Group. Before joining Aberdeen, David held executive leadership positions including: VP of Sales and Marketing at Xchange, Inc., a leader in customer relationship management; SVP of Sales and Marketing for Work Management Solutions, a developer and marketer of project and program management software for Fortune 1000 IT organizations; VP of Marketing for leading PLM vendor Parametric Technology Corporation; and VP of Alternate Channel Distribution for Computer Corporation of America.
Ask your question

Please sign in or registerto ask your question now. As a registered member of Managing Automation, you'll have access to all of our industry experts, the entire Research library and tools such as the Custom Software Comparison and Business Assessment Tool.